this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)
Formula 1
9080 readers
64 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This absolute nonsense. Max should push this issue by not complying (maybe even add a little "fuck yous" in the message). What are they going to do? Whatever the next step would be, just ignore and do not comply.
Force the hand of the FIA to show them for what they are : idiots gatekeeping nonsense. This does nothing for the sport and it is a non-issue.
Some part of me feels this is a consequence of an American company owning F1 now and implementing these BS actions that seem to be normal in US sports. I was afraid that this mentality would come to F1 and here we are...
He needs to do a public apology
"I'm very fucking sorry for my poor choice of words."
It's this liberty or MBS?
It's the same. Liberty is driven by money and it is scared advertisers will take offense and consequentially less money be generated because of it. MBS is cognizant of this concern and started to act as he also is driven by financial motives.
You could consider Liberty and MBS to be in the same camp on this one. And it is all about financials, not morals.
The British are way more afraid of swearing on national TV than the Americans are
Nope, the broadcaster just issues a (sometimes tongue in cheek) apology and everything carries on.
The US broadcasters risk breach of advertising contracts and losing money over it.
The UK broadcasters will get a small fine if they don't apologise and do it regularly.
And the public in the UK generally don't care.
Eh. US networks don't allow it, just the same as UK ones before 21:00.
Real people don't actually care.
Meh, two peas in a pod as far as I am concerned π€£
Nah, it's the Brits who say " we apologise for any strong language you may have heard" even if it was only one word because of Ofcom. I can't find any good data because search engines are glorified news machines now not finding anything older, but this has been a thing for public broadcasts for a while.