this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
230 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

but I do have to find the choice of 9 other cherry-picked countries to be an odd comparison.

Just to be clear, the "cherry-picked" countries you think are an "odd comparison" are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Might've been trying to make the point that adding a handful of other countries probably would've left us at the bottom again. Denmark, Spain, Belgium, South Korea, and Japan probably have us beat as well.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't mean it in a dismissive way, but there's a lot more countries than the Northwest Europe Privilege Corridor + their successful colonies. I just think there's more to compare with that won't leave the picture feeling so incomplete and Eurocentric.

[–] harlatan@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which countries do you want it compared to? To me the selected make a lot of sense, all comparably rich and developed countries, where else would you find them. If you compare to poor underdeveloped countries, why compare at all. Be aware that from a euro perspective, not all of the selected are considered the cream of the crop, some are just plain mediocre, but that of course depends on the survey.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Japan, Korea, China, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, etc. Non-western countries who are also generally prosperous and are known for quality healthcare.