this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
-56 points (13.2% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3549 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what do you think my motives are?

Unimportant

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So if my motives are so lame as to be unimportant, then surely I don't have much influence over things. So I may as well just post what I want when I want. And you don't have to feel worried about any votes. And we can be friends now, right?!

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wasn't being insulting. It doesn't matter your motivation and the truth of that motivation is unknowable anyway.

I'm more annoyed that the politics feed is taken over with an outsized share of third party distraction news, when there is so much going on that's actually meaningful.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’m more annoyed that the politics feed is taken over with an outsized share of third party distraction news, when there is so much going on that’s actually meaningful.

You think the share of third party news is "outsized" compared to all the pro-harris/pro-democrat articles?! I just post the articles that the news writes. So obviously news orgs think there is something to it since they are writing so many articles about third parties. I don't write them, I just post them.

If there were less written, there'd be less posted.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You think the share of third party news is "outsized"

Yes. That's why I said it. Due largely to a single user; You.

I just post the articles that the news rights.

There you go being transparently dishonest again. This is why we aren't friends.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Due largely to a single user; You.

Wow, I'm flattered that you feel I have so much influence!

There you go being transparently dishonest again.

How so?

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know what that means.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)