this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
447 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3776 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Tennessee-based media company with prominent MAGA personalities on its roster has been accused of receiving millions of dollars from two employees of Russian state-backed media company Russia Today (RT) in order to influence American viewers.

According to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, the Russian employees created a $10 million scheme “to create and distribute content to U.S. audiences with hidden Russian government messaging.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It wouldn't be surprising to hear the influencers knew full well they were being funded by Russia.

Nor would it be surprising to learn they were completely duped since they're into that sort of thing--just like their followers.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The NPR story I just recently listened to seems to claim it's a mix of the two. Or maybe a bunch of them are lying.

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I saw an X thread that alleged that Lauren Chen and her husband were the ones who worked with the Russians and tricked the other commentators, although they thought that things looked a lil bit fishy.

https://x.com/AGHamilton29/status/1831429242292465879

But that's not proof, just an X thread, I'd like to see more analysis on this.

Edit: Which NPR show did you listen to? I'd like to hear that episode.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish I knew, I was driving at the time. Maybe the morning edition or Upfirst? With the app, they just start playing until I select something specific.

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

I have both those podcasts in my app so I'll see if I can find the story in their most recent episodes. Thanks!

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Duped but I'd say more than willingly duped since it's not hard to pick up on the slant of the 'news' angle they are being pushed to put out. Someone is giving you $100k a month and they decided to not rock the boat.