this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
321 points (96.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
3046 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

​Donald Trump’s campaign insists that they’re pursuing multiple strategies against Kamala Harris, but the true picture that is emerging is that the Trump senior advisers’ grand plan, for now, is to pray that the former US president ​has a good night at the presidential debate next month.

​The game plan, in other words, has become one of hoping that Trump wins the debate so they can regain momentum – a stunning approach that shows the serious predicament for Trump and his campaign as he struggles to find ways to land effective attacks against the vice-president just months before the election.

​What has happened internally in the Trump campaign in recent weeks is the realization that nothing they do in the period up to the debate is likely to cut through in a significant way that blunts Harris’s gains that have her level in key swing state polls, according to people close to the matter.

​And because they don’t think the messaging will cut through, senior advisers are left hoping that Trump can energize voters with his performance on stage, the people said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Harris didn't do well in 2020 (edit: 2019) though. She was very uncharismatic. To her credit, she seems to have worked on that a lot since then.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She clearly struggled with the primary but has learned a lot in 5 years and a general is a very different ballgame.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She's also the nominee with all the DNC money and backing. She will have the best consultants, advisors, resources, etc, and she strikes me as the sort of person who listens to constructive feedback. In the primary, she was working against a lot of the best people in the Democratic party. She now has everyone behind her pushing forward, which is entirely different from trying to pull out ahead of a pack.

In the primary, she was on stage with Biden and Bernie and Warren and Klobuchar and Buttigieg and Yang and Beto and Booker and Castro and Gabbard and at least three other people nobody remembers. Some of those people are better speakers, some are better debaters, some have better records, some are better leaders, some have better ideas, and almost all of them are not entirely batshit insane.

She now only has to debate Donald Trump. She is a better speaker, better debater, better leader, has a better record, has better ideas, and will be the only candidate on stage who isn't entirely batshit insane. She will also be the only candidate on stage that isn't a racist. The only one who isn't a convicted felon. The only one who isn't a rapist. The only candidate who didn't incite an assault on the Capitol building to stop an election. The only candidate who isn't misogynist. The only candidate who hasn't sold state secrets to an enemy government. The only candidate who hasn't committed a felony at Arlington National Cemetery.

Plus she likes dogs.

[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

she strikes me as the sort of person who listens to constructive feedback.> Is there a particular event or thing I can look up that she did to give you that impression?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I would say her general demeanor, her presentation style, if you compare her to 2020, she has clearly gotten better at speaking and energizing a crowd. She seems more polished, more self-aware. I don't know if she was leaning towards Shapiro, but if rumors are to be believed, she listened to feedback from progressives and chose Walz. Plus, y'know, she's a rational adult who isn't a malignant narcissist or raging egomaniac.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t say Trump has much charisma left either.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree, plus people are generally tired of him. He rode a transient wave in 2016 but things are different now.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump came very close to winning in 2020. Progress is good, but we have a very long way to go, and an alarming number of Americans who still support him.

[–] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only because of the EC. He got massacred in the popular.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So? The popular doesn't matter.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is that any candidate would come close because of the EC. You could put a red hat on George of the Jungle and he'd come close.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Geoege of the jungle would be infinitely better than Trump.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

No argument here

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but he has a cult behind him who takes every one of his words as gospel

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He needs more than them to win.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

Don't worry all the "leftists" on lemmy are working overtime to get him elected as well

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Not really. EC path is still a toss up right now.