this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
217 points (99.1% liked)

Space

8478 readers
485 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Clear headline. πŸ‘

No β€œStUcK iN sPaCE.”

It’s quite a thing that they are up there for so long β€œdue to Boeing.” Though. But that’s some exhausted discourse. Whew.

[–] voluble@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They are certainly there with no means to return until February, which they will do on a different company's capsule, from a mission that was supposed to last 8 days and instead will last 8 months. That sounds like stuck to me.

Whose fault is it, if not Boeing's?

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe I'm just a jelly earthbound dude but having my space trip extended from 8 days to 8 months? Fuck yeah. I would LOVE the chance to be in space long enough to get bored of being in space.

Problems caused by being in space for too long? I'd be grateful to have them.

Risk my life just to leave the atmosphere and possibly die in space because it's hard at so damn dangerous to humans? Sign. Me. The. Fuck. Up.

I'm sure they kiss their families but man am I envious.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m sure they kiss their families

I'm assuming this was a typo, but I think it's better this way.

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Haaa I hadn't noticed but man I agree it's better that way.

I also love that people are down voting someone who's is acknowledging the risks and problems and wanting what they are experiencing.

I get that this situation isn't what they were expecting, but I'd be stoked to be in it.

Then again maybe it's because I'm focused on the space part instead of shitting on Boeing and spacex

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, not sure why people are downvoting you for expressing an opinion which affects no one other than yourself. People are weird sometimes.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"sure getting murdered is bad but at least you don't have to worry about your student loans"

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Person wants thing, acknowledges the risks involved and still wants thing.

Envious of people who are experiencing thing. Posts about it.

Gets a response from some stupid shit like you. Please stop breathing you're just a fucking oxygen thief.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Well, technically they're stuck, because I don't think there's enough seats to get everyone home without the Boeing capsule, until a SpaceX one arrives in 6 months.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, there's currently more crew than seats if you exclude the Starliner. In an emergency, I'm sure they could strap Wilmore and Williams into the Crew Dragon and/or Soyuz MS capsules somewhere, if they really had to. NASA likes to run every possible scenario, so I'm sure they already have a contingency plan for that.

Assuming they don't want to use the Starliner capsule for some reason. I haven't heard of any actual risk with using it.

Edit: I decided to actually read the article. They'd squeeze them into the Crew Dragon if they had to. And the problem with the Starliner isn't just helium leaks like I'd heard, it's also thruster seals swelling and blocking their own propellant. Thrusters are kind of important for attitude control.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Their backup plan is to have the extra 2 astronauts lie on the floor of the Crew Dragon and reenter without suits. Yep. That's still safer than Starliner.

[–] voluble@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They will have suits. There is a spare on the ISS, and Dragon will bring another one up. They covered that in the press conference.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

I meant for the 3 weeks between when Starliner leaves and the Crew 9 Dragon gets there.

until a SpaceX one arrives in 6 months

Quick correction, the SpaceX Crew-9 is scheduled to depart in 6 months. It will arrive (with two empty seats) in September. So Suni and Butch will only be "stuck" for the few days between when Starliner undocks and when the Crew-9 capsule arrives.