Dating apps don't seem to be directly trying to help solve the problem as much as generate revenue. In fact, they are very directly motivated to not make great long term matches.

Some people seem think that just getting out there and hoping for the best is the answer. Maybe that's true, but it's still very random. I was wondering about a hypothetical alternative:

What if you could go to an agency of some kind get rated through a thorough evaluation process? Would that be helpful ? It's not perfect, and many things are hard to measure. But maybe it's a less random starting point and can escape the exclusively money driven approach of dating apps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 18 points 3 months ago (7 children)

The only people I hear this sort of thing from IRL are also the ones who struggle to get out and make friends.

Lots of the free "third spaces" are gone. Churches are on the decline. The pandemic fucked everyone's socialization up. This isn't just a dating problem, it's a relationship problem.

Paying for a matchmaking service is not a new idea. Someone with no friends and nothing to talk about besides work is still going to have a limited pool of people interested in dating them, even if they pay for matches.

I seriously think most (not all bc there are always special situations) would benefit from getting into some hobbies and maybe therapy rather than expensive matchmaking services.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Church itself was never my third place, but yea, I feel like third places in general need more love. Going to a physical third place is probably less common these days, yet something we need, both as individuals and as a society.
There's hobbies places, kinda, but it's a bit less varied in the people there and often less accessible than a traditional third place.
Online forums are more accessible, but lack other good characteristics of a third place, imho.

It's obviously not the case for everyone, and I don't mean this as a generalization, but I've seen some people looking for dates who are also a bit too focused on their search, sinking their own ship.
I didn't meet my wife by hunting for a wife.
I met her doing fun things with other fun people, in whom I had no romantic interest whatsoever, and we eventually met as friends of a friend and it snowballed from there.

If you desire romantic companionship, start by making non-romantic friends?
I'm not saying that's easy either, I know I've often been too drained from work to do much socializing.

[–] tributarium@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you desire romantic companionship, start by making non-romantic friends?

I tend to agree. For me, an otherwise unfulfilled person looking for a fulfilling successful romantic relationship is kind of like a poor person trying to become a millionaire. You should take care of your basic needs before aiming for something that, probably, few people ever realistically get to have.

That said, overwhelmingly, what I want is friendship (love and understanding) but it's much, much harder to find ways to meet people for friendship than a romantic relationship. There is no friendship app on the same level as the dating apps. People who want to get in my pants text back much more reliably than potential friends I meet even irl. I shouldn't complain because having a lot of suitors is a pleasant problem to have but I work unsociable hours and on more days than I care to admit, the only human contact I get outside of work is on dating apps, which is not a happy situation for me.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yea, it's hard to organically meet new people these days.

A "third place" would be nice, but I don't think I've really had one in my life for a while. A place that's neither home nor work, where there's no strings attached and random people hanging out.

I imagine that's also frustrating to not be looking for the same thing as the few you do end up meeting.

load more comments (4 replies)