555
Who is that woman on the right? Are we supposed to recognize her or something?
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
555 points (94.3% liked)
People Twitter
5189 readers
2018 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'd still vote for whatever that is on the right side
Hell yeah, hail Satan, full Communism now. (Mostly serious)
At least right is honest and not convicted of anything.
Do you not see how easy to manipulate that makes you?
And before libs get their panties in a twist - fuck trump, but seriously, when you're at the point of "I don't care what I'm voting for, just not that guy", you're not the one with any power, you're just another puppet whose consent to at best maintain the status quo is easily manufactured by those who actually have the power, and with exactly the same tactics used on the other "team".
What exactly do you think the alternative is here? Not voting just surrenders what little power the electoral process does give you. Even if electoral politics aren't a meaningful way to advance your vision of a better country, this is still an opportunity, however small, to reduce the harm that will be done under a Trump presidency. Like, even if you don't expect Harris to meaningfully improve things (and there are a lot of areas where a former cop probably shouldn't be expected to), the alternative is someone who continues to actively promise to make those same areas even worse.
Characterizing her as just a "former cop" isn't fair. She was a district attorney, then an attorney general, then a senator, then vice president.
Absolutely, and her record in those roles imo actually suggests at least some awareness of the kinds of problems that need to be solved there, though I'm sufficiently cynical about things that I would be surprised to see significant action on federal reforms. I'm cautiously optimistic about her, but my point is that even if you don't think she's any different from a rank-and-file Republican that would still make it irresponsible not to vote against Trump and the very specific plans he and the people around him have to make all of those problems even worse.
There is definitely room to push the Overton window farther left and (federal) electoral politics does not give an avenue to do that as long as the Republican party continues to drift further right. But the way to do that does not involve abandoning powerful federal offices like the goddamned presidency to right-wing loons.
Look man, it's true, our government gives us very little real choice, and having to make a binary choice for president sucks. But that's what we have, it isn't getting fixed before November, and I really can stress enough how bad one of the choices is. So, given no other realistic choice, I am going to vote to defeat that fascist orange idiot, and even if the person who wins isn't great, it's such a low bar not to be worse than Trump, I can confidently say that I will vote for whoever the DNC nominates, with virtually no exceptions.
This isn't a difficult position to arrive at, and nobody holding this position is actually serious about voting for literally anyone. We're just using hyperbole because it's pretty much impossible for the DNC to nominate anyone worse than Trump.
And I actually like Kamala, fwiw.
Lol what?