this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
344 points (92.6% liked)

Greentext

4375 readers
1816 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It has to do with geology. Europe basically swallowed up and mixed in with another continent a long time ago after Pangea broke up

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

it really doesn't:

In contrast, the present eastern boundary of Europe partially adheres to the Ural and Caucasus Mountains, which is somewhat arbitrary and inconsistent compared to any clear-cut definition of the term "continent".

The current division of Eurasia into two continents now reflects East-West cultural, linguistic and ethnic differences which vary on a spectrum rather than with a sharp dividing line.

There's really no physical reasoning for it. You can read on in that article for the historical basis if you want (basically, Homer and other Greeks coined it, and it just kind of stuck), but it's really quite arbitrary where scientists actually draw the line.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My bad, should clarify I was referring to this specifically:

In geology, a continent is defined as "one of Earth's major landmasses, including both dry land and continental shelves". The geological continents correspond to seven large areas of continental crust that are found on the tectonic plates, but exclude small continental fragments such as Madagascar that are generally referred to as microcontinents. Continental crust is only known to exist on Earth.

If we're talking about tectonic plates, then:

  • Europe is part of Eurasia
  • Arabian peninsula, India, and far east Russia aren't part of it, but we'd probably include them as subcontintents

We'd end up with the following continents:

  • N. America (technically includes far east Russia) w/ Caribbean subcontinent
  • S. America
  • Eurasia w/ Indian and Arabian subcontintents
  • Africa w/ Somali subcontinent
  • Australia
  • Antarctica

Image.

Honestly, that would be a much more satisfactory definition than the current one, which seems to be "large landmass bigger than Greenland with logical separations when they're too big." What I really don't understand is when people say Europe and Asia are separate, but N. America and S. America are combined, that's logically inconsistent.