this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
305 points (99.4% liked)

Space

8704 readers
49 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (2 children)

NASA should start manufacturing things themselves.

[–] jorp@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

state owned production?? what's next: doing things not for shareholder profit?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

You gotta transfer all wealth to the most kleptocratic incompetent capitalists otherwise literal communism.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

In the entire history of NASA, they’ve never manufactured any boosters for themselves. Redstone was from the army. Titan, also military. Saturn I and V were designed by NASA but contracted to big aircraft manufacturers as contractors. Shuttle was Boeing / Rockwell for the orbiter, ATK for the boosters. SLS is basically all the Shuttle contractors, again. (That was the point.)

I hear what you’re saying. But NASA would need to spin up an entire company from scratch to build their own rockets. That’s not what their mandate is, and it’s not what they’re good at.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The difference is that NASA was really on top of them. There are entire manuals and documentaries not just on how they did Apollo, but also on how they organised it, and how they ran every process.

And they chucked all of that away for some of the most insane hodgepodge improvised bullshit imaginable. The entire SLS/HLS split is ridiculous, and serves no propose other than giving companies more money for little gain.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

A lot of the Apollo work also got done in basically one administration (Johnson largely continued JFK’s policies). As soon as Nixon was in charge, NASA got gutted, and then they only had the resources for shuttle. Later Apollo missions got cancelled because Nixon thought the money was better spent killing more Vietnamese people.

Switching administrations means vastly changing policies, if for no other reason than the new boss hates the old boss. SLS “succeeded” (got hardware made and launched, at least) where Constellation failed partly because they buttered everyone’s bread in the right way.

HLS is dumb. SLS is dumb. But similarly to Commercial Cargo and Crew, it survived administration changes partly because NASA wasn’t directly at the helm, so the new guys didn’t just hit the big red stop button.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

Is the US an oligarchy now? It certainly feels like it is.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Just mooting it would send a shot across the bow. And it would get the ball rolling if the private industry didn't reform it.