this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
659 points (94.5% liked)

solarpunk memes

2597 readers
304 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 236 points 1 month ago (35 children)

I reject the premise that right-wingers can be anarchists. I don’t care what they call themselves. Anarchism is a left-wing movement, fundamentally.

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 148 points 1 month ago (2 children)

anarcho-capitalism is actually corporate fascism

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A bit debatable on the individual level but that’s likely what it would lead to. Some ancaps are weirdly anti-corporate though. They think somehow big powerful corporations were created by the state. Which is true in some cases but clearly not in others.

[–] mark3748@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago (7 children)

All corporations are created by the state. Corporations only exist because of the laws that create them. Without that special legal status it’s pretty much impossible to grow to the sizes most corporations do.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 month ago (29 children)

The same is true for private-property and capitalism in general, which is why "anarcho-capitalism" is so absurd.

[–] mark3748@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

I wholeheartedly agree!

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m not sure I fully agree… some corporate entities are large enough to be self reinforcing. In practice they may end up recreating the state, but I don’t think it’s necessary impossible for large corporate structures to emerge in a stateless society. Of course, the nature of the stateless society is a very important variable here. A society that is hostile to accumulated wealth and social domination would make this much more difficult.

[–] mark3748@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A corporation is a legal construct. While it’s theoretically possible for a single business to grow very large, most of the exploitation and legal cover provided by the simple act of incorporation becomes nearly impossible.

Plus without a state to push down competition, it becomes a lot harder to monopolize a market. Ideally there wouldn’t even be a market to monopolize, but that’s a different discussion altogether.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Incorporation is just a formality required by law. Corporations could still exist through internal cooperation without that, as long as there is no outside force that disrupts them.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

But without a state above them to reinforce laws the corporation would have to enforce them. So they don't have to follow their own laws, and thus become something else. More like a warband of kingdom or junta.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What do you think is the quality that would make such an organization still be a "corporation"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Are large street gangs (Crips, etc.) not an example of a huge corporation operating outside the benefits of the law?

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

A corporation by definition benefits from the law.

Corporations are businesses that have been given the the legal rights of a person. As if they had a body. Or corpus, if you will.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

Same with pirates. They have an internal structure and share profit, but are very illegal.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

No. Not all organizations are corporations.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

It's just latter-day feudalism. Their program is to Make Landlords Lords Again.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, and I think that’s the joke here.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kind of seems like that’s what they’re getting at but I find this linguistic deception so irritating that I can’t even tolerate the implicit suggestion here that the top dude might be some kind of anarchist.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

The people the meme is referring to call themselves anarcho-capitalists, it's not even implicit. It's why they have the blue line flag and Gadsden flag, where normally these would be contradictory they lack the critical thinking skills to not polish boots with their tongue.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they didn't blatantly steal ideas from the left and twist it to support rich people, where would they get ideas? Have you stopped and considered how mentally bankrupt they are?

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Literally I think I've seen a handful or fewer conservative memes that weren't just a shitty spin on a leftists meme.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Back The Blue supporters jamming to Rage against the Machine for decades then suddenly getting upset at the band.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same vibes as when they got mad at Green Day for trashing Trump. Like they never paid attention at all.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But a punk band trashing a right-wing president? That's never happened before!

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s not like their most widely recognized song was written to trash a right-wing president /s

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So what else do you call not-having-a-government-ism?

[–] Val@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago

Anti-statism. Anarchism is against all hierarchy. Including class.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

The terms "right wing" and "left wing" are quite nebulous, anyways.

load more comments (29 replies)