this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
461 points (96.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9781 readers
208 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ok let me preface this by saying every single person experiencing homelessness deserves the security of a roof over their head and more.

<150,000 is surprisingly low to me.

Is this nationwide? The upward trend is concerning no doubt, clearly something is wrong is more people are experiencing chronic homelessness at a rapidly rising rate. But honest to god I am shocked to see it isn’t at least 1-2mill nationwide.

Edit: thinking about it now 1 in 300 would be pretty high

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It is a notoriously hard metric to track

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and my 1-2mill would mean 1 in 150-300 which would be pretty high tbh

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

But think of all the people you know living in vans and campers. For me, these days that's a lot of people. I really don't think that's enough either

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Why don't they just go door to.... ah, nevermind.

[–] PagPag@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It was triggered today… and has had only two false positives since 1959.

What most people don’t know is that the economist who coined the term, Claudia Sahm, proposed this rule as a way to warn governments to allow them to preemptively send out stimulus to their population lol.

The Sahm rule originates from a chapter in the Brookings Institution's report on the use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy during recessions.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahm_Rule#cite_note-2)The chapter, written by Sahm, proposes fiscal policy to automatically send stabilizing payments to citizens to boost economic well-being. Instead of relying on human intuition to determine when such payments should be sent, Sahm outlines a condition to trigger the payments.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahm_Rule#cite_note-:1-3) The trigger suggested indicates an economy beginning a recession and is now known as the Sahm rule. The Sahm rule recession indicator was also featured early in a Goldman Sachs U.S. economic research report by economist William C. Dudley with a recommended trigger of 0.33%

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahm_Rule#cite_note-4) (the nowadays more commonly used rule triggers a recession signal when the Sahm metric is crossing above 0.5%).

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That last chart uses "raw" numbers but it needs to be compared using per 100k or something of the sort