this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
250 points (97.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
2888 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A 12-year-old girl in Tennessee has been charged with murder, accused of smothering her 8-year-old cousin as the younger girl slept. A relative said they had been arguing over an iPhone.

A security camera recorded the killing, inside the bedroom they shared on July 15 in Humboldt, Tennessee, the county prosecutor said.

The recording shows the older child using bedding to suffocate her cousin as the younger girl slept in the top bunk, Gibson District Attorney Frederick Agee’s statement said. After the child died, “the juvenile cleaned up the victim and repositioned her body,” Agee said.

A relative told WREG-TV in Memphis that the girls had been arguing over an iPhone after coming from out of town to stay with their grandmother.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Why was a security camera in the bedroom? Or was it somewhere else but you could see in the bedroom? Am I the only one who finds this odd, or is this a common thing to have for 12 and/or 8 year olds?

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Some people are surveillance'd out. I personally find it weird when people have fuckin Alexa or Google assistant in their house. Like u really want Bezos listening to your every word so u don't have to walk 3 feet to the light switch? Different strokes I guess, but I don't want a doorbell cam n I for sure don't want cam(s) inside my fucking house especially ones connected to multinational conglomerates that are going to use it to spy on me n sell me ads.

[–] Duranie 32 points 4 months ago

"after coming from out of town to stay with their grandmother."

I'm assuming this means this was the grandmother's house they were staying at?

I work in hospice and and it's not uncommon for a family member to have multiple cameras set up in an elderly loved ones house for safety reasons. Maybe she wants to remain independent, but is a fall risk. We've had patients refuse in home caregivers, but allow family to put in cameras to watch for falls.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They don't need to listen to your every word. They have so much information on you that they can pinpoint you pretty well. They would like to, but it's too risky. However making it easy for you to give them information willingly, yes please they are on board.

There is no evidence they are actually always processing everything, and people have been trying to prove it for a long time now. But it seems like they do what they say they are doing: listening for wake words.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if say a country with some less scrupulous agencies with names like "NSA" and "CIA" and "FBI" could pay or force amazon to also key in at trigger words like "bomb" or "protest," or even just in an effort to get the ads that much closer to inside our brains Chevy pays them to key on "Truck" and "Ford" to attempt to sway customers who discuss it.

Who knows if the trigger words you know are the only trigger words, there's no reason it would need to alert you, it could do it quietly in the background.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can always go and test this instead of just assuming it's true because it's what you already believe is true.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No I can't, because I don't allow google on my phone much less in my house. GrapheneOS 4 life.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can, you're just unwilling.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nope, can't. Physically incapable of subjecting myself to spyware intentionally. I'll continue the inconvenience of typing it myself when I have to search something on a google alternative, no use for those dumb machines for me anyway.

My TV is a 2007 LCD dumb tv, I still have a VCR, an OG xbox, and an NES hooked up to it. Take yer technologies, I don't need em.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Noone is saying you have to put anything in your house or get any type of device.

I'm just saying that you can actually test this, in a way that does not jeopardize your privacy, such as in a controlled lab environment, but you're unwilling to do this. You certainly do not lack the ability to do so.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok buy me a lab. Sounds like you have the money to spare with suggestions like that.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I could, but I won't.

I believe you would just come up with another reason you "can't" do it, just like being "physically incapable" of it. Add to that I've seen other people already do it and I have no reason to not trust their findings that I think it would be a waste of money to try and convince someone who would probably just ignore their own eyes anyway.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you actually think this is clever rather than just revealing how dishonest you are?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately, not having enough money for a lab and lacking a donor, you, I am incapable.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I aways get “but it only listens when you say the trigger word” when I talk about how much I hate spy speakers

That makes no fucking sense

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Only if you choose to ignore the explanation.

The device listens locally for the trigger word. When it hears it, it wakes up and starts processing what you're saying, sending that to Google or whoever and getting a response back. It isn't constantly processing or what you're saying beyond "was that 'hey Google'?".

[–] dave@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago

That’s because the explanation is often a bit disingenuous. There’s practically no difference between “listening locally” and “constantly processing what you’re saying”. The device is constantly processing what you’re saying, simply to recognise the trigger word. That processing just isn’t shared off device until the trigger is detected. That’s the claim by the manufacturers, and so far it’s not been proved wrong (as mentioned elsewhere, plenty of people are trying). It’s hard to prove a negative but so far it seems not enough data is leaving to prove anything suspect.

I would put money on a team of people working for Amazon / Google to extract value from that processed speech data without actually sending that data off device. Things like aggregate conversation topic / sentiment, logging adverts heard on tv / radio for triangulation, etc. None of that would invalidate the “not constantly recording you” claim.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

I will never trust that ever

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 months ago

They're often cheaper and better than "video baby monitors"

[–] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I was also surprised by that, but I'm still surprised people have them in their living rooms. I guess it's like upgrading from a baby monitor??

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

It's getting hard to find a baby monitor that doesn't have a camera.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

No idea, glad it’s not just me I guess.

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I have them in my young kids’ rooms but it’s mostly just to make sure they’re in bed and not screwing around. Once they get a bit older, they’ll be removed. I don’t know how you’d justify a camera in a 12 year old’s room without very explicit needs and communication.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

The kids were at grandma's house, visiting. So not their own bedroom.