this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
447 points (93.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3798 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 58 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Huh, I had assumed Newsweek was mostly left, but it looks like you're correct:

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

I haven't read it in over a decade though...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsweek/

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

FWIW, I had a subscription over a decade ago. I can't say I ever thought of it as "Left", it was at best, corporate center. But it definitely has gone more right as it has also gone more sensationalist. They partnered with Daily Beast for a while, and then were sold to IBT media, an international "news and Information" conglomerate. I think your memories are from the old hard journalism days, and they have gone back to corporate, but corporate-right.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

I could have sworn previously that maggot chuds used to call it NewsWeak. Guess new ownership had different plans

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah I member when newsweek would find an excuse to put Jesus' face on the cover ever other week.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Isn't all corporate, right or center? This is maybe a me problem but I think of the Democrats as a center right party because of their policies regarding corporations.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

You can assume a right-center bias for almost any outlet, and I think mediabiasfactcheck needs to recalibrate, if we are being honest. See their assessment of NYT, as a for instance.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wow, yeah. I thought Newsweek was a staunchly centrist organization.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not shilling for them but I like ground news for the bias ratings.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The ground premise is interesting and all my lefty podcasts have offer codes. I've been thinking about giving them a try

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I bought into a year of the vantage plan and it's been pretty good. It actually renewed a couple of months ago. I check it every day generally.