this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
187 points (97.9% liked)

World News

32327 readers
475 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan plans to require day nurseries, kindergartens and schools to use a government system to confirm that those applying to work the

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jernej@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's always a question of where you draw the line. Two consenting adults hooking up (whatever you interpret that to mean, I'll assume that the adults are unclothed for simplicity), fine. Being in a car, fine. Hooking up in the private confines of your house, fine. Hooking up in public, not fine. Is a car considered a private location? I guess if someone sees you then no it is not. Hooking up in a camper would be fine. If you put up blinds on the windows of your car does that make it fine? What if you're parked on your own property? What if you're in your garage? What if you are able to find somewhere to park where someone would have to deliberately be trying to see in to see you? There is some case law already pertaining to being naked in your own home. Local laws may be different but are probably similar.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It is quite subject to the officer of the day and the whims of the court system.

[–] Hank@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I'd say fucking outdoors is ok if the fuckers put in effort not to be seen or intervening with the daily lives of others. Anything beyond that is the responsibility of the potential onlookers.
Imagine living in a world where it's illegal to fulfill the most basic human needs outdoors.

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legislatures are encouraged to make sure the line is as broad as possible, because there's frequently stories of actual rapists and child abusers pleading out of sex offender registration. When the evidence is muddy and the prosecution doesn't want to chance it at trial, but has enough to nail them for something, frequently sex offender registration is a big bargaining chip.

Thus in many states, public urination is a sex offense.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My defense would be "you may find urine sexual your honour, but I'm not a freak like you, so this isn't a sexual crime".

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's often not the judge's discretion, is the thing. Any person duly convicted of crimes under xyz statutes (i.e.: public indecency/public urination) shall be listed, so the court/prosecutors can massage it to disorderly conduct for a cooperative defendant or whatever.