Casual Conversation

1691 readers

107 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
Keep the conversation nice and light hearted
Encourage conversation in your post
Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Blaze@lemm.ee

shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee

orangeNgreen@lemmy.world

neidu2@feddit.nl

Am I the only one who doesn't really care about graphics? (lemm.ee)

submitted 5 months ago by shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee to c/casualconversation@lemm.ee

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As video games develop more and more over the years, companies have been making them more and more realistic-looking. I can guess this is related to expectations, but am I the only one who doesn't care about graphics? We could be using the same processing power to store worlds that have as much exploration potential as the Earth itself if we weren't afraid to save on processing power by going back to 8-bit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Twilight princess had double the global sales of WW though lol

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Possibly because one was on a console that sold "okay", and the other was on one of the biggest-selling systems of all time

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

Not unlikely. Still means TP was better commercially than WW. I love them both