this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
177 points (98.4% liked)

Firefox

17815 readers
56 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's how they should work.

When I get an ad in the mail, the advertiser doesn't know that I actually looked at it. When I grab a newspaper ad at the store, the advertiser doesn't know that I did that unless I use a coupon or something.

That's how I'd like online ads to work, but with a bit of targeting based on local-only data.

If they want me to look at ads, they're going to need to respect my privacy. If not, I'm content leaving my ad-blocker enabled.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The whole point of targeted advertising is that you get to bid on people you want. You want a old fat guy in Oklahoma? Done You want to advertise gambling apps to people who have a history of gambling? Done.

That's certainly true from Google's or Meta's perspective, but it wasn't always that way.

I get ads in my mailbox that are completely irrelevant to me, like Medicare ads (probably for the previous owner). As a kid, I watched lots of ads on TV that definitely weren't applicable to me (e.g. cutco knives, when I wasn't old enough to use a knife). I see billboards on my way to work for debt relief (not in any debt, aside from mortgage) and addiction recovery (no addictions here). Companies pay quite a bit for those ads even if they won't be relevant for most people because of the sheer reach of those ads.

I'm proposing a middleground. Ad companies don't get as accurate of targeting for ads, but in exchange they get seen by people who would otherwise block them.