this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1882 points (89.8% liked)

Political Memes

5602 readers
466 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1882
Just a reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I just want one election in my life where it's not the end of the goddamn world if Democrats lose, so I'm allowed to vote for someone I actually like.

Just one fucking election.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You really don't. Because Dems have been selling themselves as essentially "Vote for us because you should be scared shitless the other guy might win."

When the GOP eventually wins again (please let Trump be dead or imprisoned by then, maybe 2032 at the earliest?) if the country doesn't immediately descend into Christo-fascist super-Nazism the Dems are going to have to totally reinvent because "vote for us or it's the end of the world" won't fly any more if they lose and the world doesn't end, which means once they lose they are probably going to lose several times in a row until they come up with a better pitch.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've been reading "this is the most important election of our lifetimes" online since the 1990s. It's never the same people saying it between elections, and career politicians don't make this argument.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't think that's realistic in a democracy unfortunately. It'll always come down to who you like better, but not who you actually like. Even countries with popular vote parliamentary systems don't have the luxury of voting for people they like.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I feel ya. All we can do is try to keep our loved ones and each other safe and improve our lives.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

If that's all we can do why did we even bother coming down out of the trees?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If we had sane voting, like STAR, we would be able to express such a preference without wasting a vote we need to cast against the worse choice.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Has that worked well where it's been implemented?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You say that like the stakes truly aren't as high as people say they are.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I say that like it's happened in every fucking election I've been aware of since I was born.

And if the stakes are even higher then we're actively circling the drain as a nation.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hmm weird because I don't remember 50% of the country saying Mitt Romney is a fascist and even if some did, they didn't have a pile of valid evidence for their argument like they have for trump today

And that wasn't even that long ago. Huge difference, if you're thinking of making some argument that it's slowly gotten more intense.

But yes of course every election is actually the exact fucking same. If you turn your brain all the way off anyhow.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I'm not saying they're the exact fucking same. I'm saying they're getting fucking worse.

Also wasn't the Romney election where they had "Vote or Die' shirts?

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You say that like people haven't been saying that exact same thing every election for all of US history. It's a tactic to silence unrepresented groups and bully them into conformity. Some people think differently from you and do legitimately view both the Democrats and Republicans as anti-democratic organizations.

And since at least the ones on the left were personally deprived of a fair election by the Democrats in 2016 and arguably 2020, pretending the Democrats are not also a threat to democracy immediately makes any argument you make fall on deaf ears. Instead, the Dem base parrots the party lines about progressives being the ones who gave us Trump in 2016. Despite literal evidence that the Dems propped him up during the primary.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly the lie this post was created to criticize

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Donald, an insurrectionist: "I should be allowed to murder political opponents."

SCOTUS: "Oh, maybe he's right, let's consider."

You: "Everything is fine, just another regular election."

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Everything is decidedly not fine. Where was that in my comment? I merely pointed out that your rhetoric is the same as we hear every election.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A president who claims he can murder whomever, whenever is novel, horrifying, and would be the end of voting. Who is going to stop him if SCOTUS rules that way and how? Especially with half the legislative branch complicit. And in fact this same person has already committed an insurrection. You want to play it off, "oh, you guys are panicking every four years."

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Once again, you're saying I'm saying things that I'm not.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, those are the things you are saying right now.

You're free to go in depth and clarify what your intent is saying, "we hear this every election," when people are discussing an openly authoritarian candidate who publicly wants to murder political opponents and has already done an insurrection.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

My intent was to push back on your unfounded retort to someone saying they wish there would be one election where the Democrats didn't try to guilt people into voting for them based on fearmongering. You responded to them with... fearmongering. I responded to you to point out that your fearmongering is the same tactic used in every election ever. I didn't make any claims about the validity of Trump's threat to the US.

You then kept putting different words and claims into my mouth to argue against. So I kept saying "no, I'm just saying that this fearmongering is the same as has been used in every election."