this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
183 points (93.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2464 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Notably, Chang's report claims that biological females develop earlier than males do, so requiring girls to enter school at younger ages will create classes in which the two sexes are of more equal maturity as they age. This, the author posits, makes it more likely that those classmates will be attracted to each other, and marry and have children further down the line."

(...)

"The report does not include evidence of any correlation between female students' early enrollment and the success rate of their romantic relationships with men. The author also does not detail specific mechanisms by which his proposed policy would increase romantic attraction or birthrates."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

No, at some point the human population won't be able to increase forever and as conditions are improving in poorer nations their birthrate is decreasing, I'm just pointing out the obvious, immigration is the solution to birthrate problems in some parts of the world and it's the solution to overpopulation in other parts.

Heck, that's exactly what multicultural countries are doing, it's an issue with Asian countries that refuse to welcome people of other cultures.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the human population won't be able to increase forever

Just gonna point out that this isn't a problem.

[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would argue it is a problem in a capitalist society where constant and eternal economic growth is necessary.

Then again, I would also argue that capitalism is the problem.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Correct. If the masses benefitted from industrialization rather than just the corporations, we could have a high quality of life for everyone, population growth be damned.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Never said it was, but it's ridiculous to think it's normal to let certain territories become empty out of nationalistic pride when people are suffering out of lack of resources in other territories.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just to chime in. I was interested to randomly see in my feed the other day about how divorce between an American husband and Japanese wife, is at a lower rate than is between Japanese citizens.

I found it interesting that some cultures might be slightly more compatible with each other.

Anyway.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

Not surprising, Americans living in Japan don't tend to adopt the crazy work schedule that's considered normal over there.