this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
178 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alexc@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Isn’t flying the flag upside down against the US Flag code? Then again, so is turning it into clothing IIRC.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

These people believe that the law protects but does not bind them.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Also, technically the Flag Code isn't the law. Not that that occurred to them when people were using it for progressive protests.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure to some sovcits out there, flag code is as sacred as maritime law from 200 years ago.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

You have to accept these pieces of paper I printed out instead of me paying off my credit card debt because I invoke USC 420.69 Hocus Pocus Debt Begonus.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I had to laugh when I was talking to some young con at my university who was beside himself that someone....gasp!....burned a flag on campus in protest. He thought whoever burned it should be in prison.

I first asked him - what about the First Amendment? He didn't GAF - not "that kind" of free speech, that's too far! I asked him if he knew what the proper disposal of a flag was? I told him the right way was to BURN it, and so what should happen to those people who are disposing of flags under this new law he wanted that banned burning of flags? He didn't believe me and was aghast that I'd even say such a thing. LOL.

I also asked him what he thought should happen to old shirts, shoes, and every other random item the flag is plastered all over - if someone tosses those in the trash, and they get incinerated, who goes to jail for that? At this point, he was kinda worn out...

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

They never think their gonzo opinions through to their logical conclusions.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

No, but you see how they care about rules in general.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

And binds but does not protect anyone else.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, its an old symbol of distress

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I mean...

[Gestures wildly at the state of the USA]

Yeah.

[–] slippery_salmons@lemmy.today 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For the clothing thing, Isn't the rule just that you can't turn a flag into clothing. You're allowed to make clothes with patterns from flags as long as the material didn't come from a flag.

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's correct, some still find it disrespectful though.

[–] DBT@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

When it fits their narrative.