Programmer Humor

32495 readers

349 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

384

Switching to OCaml bois (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DriftinGrifter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 5 months ago (2 children)

you can write oop without inhetitance

[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 10 points 5 months ago

There's the camp of those who say that inheritance is synonymous with OOP. I'm not in that camp, but I'd like to see you duke it out with them.

[–] prashanthvsdvn@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s just structs and unions right?

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You will still have private/public sections, interfaces (unless you class them as inheritance), classes and instances, the SOLID principles, composition over inheritance. OOP is a lot more than just large family trees of inheritance, a way of thinking that's been moved away from for a long time.