this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
336 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3386 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This brings the total under this administration to $167 Billion in relief for 4.75 million borrowers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nope, re-read the comment, it says "Jill Stein"

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Re-read, I said “Two Party System”

What we need is ranked voting so that a Stein then Biden vote would actually matter. Unless Trump is your second?

[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Voting for Biden is a sure way to show support against ranked choice voting, instead you could build support for an opposition.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Where were you December 2019? 2015? I was voting green and supporting and donating to the greens.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Before I give you math to show you why I vote democrat, please understand that I’m not a democrat, and I fuucking hate Hillary—even though I voted for her (after Bernie in the primary of course).

In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump won key swing states by margins that could have been impacted if all third-party voters had instead voted for Hillary Clinton. Here’s the analysis for three crucial states:

Michigan

  • Trump’s Margin of Victory: 10,704 votes
  • Third-Party Votes: 251,371

Would Clinton Have Won: Yes

Wisconsin

  • Trump’s Margin of Victory: 22,748 votes
  • Third-Party Votes: 188,330

Would Clinton Have Won: Yes

Pennsylvania

  • Trump’s Margin of Victory: 44,292 votes
  • Third-Party Votes: 256,348

Would Clinton Have Won: Yes

In each of these states, the number of third-party votes was significantly higher than Trump’s margin of victory. Therefore, if all third-party voters had instead voted for Hillary Clinton, she would have won these key states, potentially changing the overall outcome of the election.

Again, I didn’t love the idea of Hillary in office, but the court wouldn’t have been stacked and RvW would be intact, among many other things.

I’m not trying to place blame. But I am trying to suggest that we first need ranked voting before we can have more than two parties. Those other parties are the ones who can swing the election… but not in a predictable way that can be used as a tactic.

If you want Green (on Election Day)… you get Trump.

[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

if all third-party voters had instead voted for Hillary Clinton.

You mean the Libertarian party that got 3x the votes of the Green party? They aint voting for Dems, ever. Same with Green party voters so your argument is void.

In each of these states, the number of third-party votes was significantly higher than Trump’s margin of victory.

Most of which are libertarian votes, also you are not entitled to any votes, that's not how it works.

I’m not trying to place blame. But I am trying to suggest that we first need ranked voting before we can have more than two parties.

Which is why supporting and building the Green party is so important, so we can fight for RCV.

If you want Green (on Election Day)… you get Trump.

If you don't want RCV or universal healthcare, you vote for Biden.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

wishful thinking, but not reality.

[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm making it a reality, you are submitting to duopoly for no reason.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Submitting is a bold choice of words. I am doing what I feel is the best way to keep the right wing out of power. And since both you and I have very little power, the only thing we can do is vote.

You aren’t making anything a reality. Tell me what the Green Party has accomplished so far.

[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am doing what I feel is the best way to keep the right wing out of power.

I can respect that, but you're voting for right wingers, making the problem worse.

Greens have historically put several important issues into the public view, especially with climate change. We have had some success with local politics as well, and are poised to make a run a 5% of the general here in November. These are all better than Dems moving us to the right.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

into the public view.

But they didn’t put them there. They just agree with climate change, etc.

You’re actually the first person online I’ve heard who said “Green Party!” There are obviously more supporters, but the party’s marketing is terrible. The average Joe doesn’t know anything about them. I think a significant number of left leaning voters would agree completely with the major talking points of the Green Party. Heck, I do. To be sure, I just went down the list and they checked almost all of my boxes.

voting for right-wingers.

This is very relative to where each of us consider the center point. I’m never going to get what I want from a single vote. All I can do right now is try to keep the rights we have, vote for the status quo, and hope this country doesn’t turn into The Handmaid’s Tale

Ranked voting should be the single focus of the Green Party. They will not ever be elected without it. Nothing can actually topple the Big Two without it.

[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But they didn’t put them there.

Yeah, they did.

the party’s marketing is terrible. The average Joe doesn’t know anything about them.

Then donate or volunteer and do something about it like I am.

I’m never going to get what I want from a single vote.

Yeah, it will take several. But you choose to not start that process.

Ranked voting should be the single focus of the Green Party. They will not ever be elected without it. Nothing can actually topple the Big Two without it.

It is, what are you doing to achieve that?

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Donating, volunteering, gathering support for the largest party that supports RCV

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tell me some of the things your party has accomplished beyond awareness.

[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Become the largest party that supports RCV

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Party started. 🎉🥳