this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

Entertainment

4597 readers
6 users here now

Movies, television and Broadway.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Whom@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
50
‘Furiosa’ Up In Smoke With $31M-$33M, Lowest Memorial Day Opening In Decades, Might Get Clawed By ‘Garfield’: How Worried Should Hollywood Be About Theatrical? (deadline.com)
submitted 6 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/entertainment@beehaw.org
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I love Fury Road. It's a spectacular film. This "sequel" just looks bad. You can tell it's green screened, when the on destination actual vehicles is so much of why Fury Road was great. The acting and writing seem bad. And that's just from the trailer that's supposed to make you want to watch it.

[–] HauntingScience@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

I’m sure you liked it, as I’m sure a bunch of people legitimately did.

What I’m saying is that I think most people saw Fury Road because of societal pressure due to a very small minority propping up the movie. I went to see it and found the movie to be an incredibly unsatisfying story about a FEDEX delivery that ended in the starting point. Useless.

I thought I was crazy reading so many people liked it, but now this gives support to my personal opinion.