aww

Indian here. Tigers are not household pets, as keeping them is illegal. Hell, keeping a body part of a dead tiger requires a permit, and is only allowed under very rare circumstances. Tigers have better protections under Indian law than humans.

My evidence is anecdotal, such as videos of people lounging with a tiger in their living room. There's also the weird thing in the...90s? Where driving around in a large car with a tiger was a dare-sport thing (which is why it appears as an activity in Saints Row: The Third )

I believe it's not exactly legal to keep tigers or large cats as pets in industrialized parts of the world (at least not without proper holding cells) but there are huge parts of the world that are less industrialized and are not sufficiently policed to stop symbiotic social relationships between humans and wild animals.

On a similar thread, cheetahs are notoriously easy to domesticate, to the point that they're a problem. If you go out to cheetah territory, say in Kenya, and feed one, it may decide you're their buddy for life and follow you home. Unlike black bears in Montana or Wyoming that assault tourists for food when they learn that's a source, it's for the protection of the currently endangered cheetah population.

As for other large cats, I don't know how often they companion up. Here in the states, we have mountain lions, but we also have ranger services to police both the lions and the tourists. I suspect in places like Nepal where there are human settlements removed enough from industry there also may be negotiations between leopards and humans with positive outcomes. But that is speculation. I haven't seen videos of that.

ETA: Scanning news, apparently in 2024 there are a lot of tigers-as-pets in Texas of all places, which is a lot more contrived since it's not adopting and befriending the beastie from the nearby jungle, but importing them in to be domesticated.