this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
1687 points (87.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9759 readers
1061 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All children in Gaza are terriosts! Or potential terriosts! Isreal NEEDS to bomb ambulances, hospitals and water wells because that is where all the terriosts are! ya see?Any amount of infrastructure supports terriosism! Bombing is a nessecity!

It's outright ghoulish.

[–] quatschkopf34@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it‘s actually true that Hamas uses civil infrastructure and civilians as shields, you can’t deny that. Of course that doesn‘t mean that Israel can just bomb everything.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

in an area where the population density is 5,300 people/km2 "human shields" is a quite weak argument. It is practically impossible to seperate civillian and military infrastructure in such densely populated areas.

For comparision the Netherlands has about 500 people/km2 and it is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe.

[–] quatschkopf34@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a difference between the close proximity of military and civilian infrastructure because of a high population density and actively choosing hospitals as military bases.

[–] Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another great way of not getting your civilians targeted is to wear identifying uniforms.

It's almost like Hamas doesn't want to prevent civilian casualties.

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that totally justifies killing everyone in sight

[–] Guydht@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

No, but it does justify telling all civilians to evacuate weeks before launching an actual full scale attack, increasing their odds of survival from 0% to 90%. War is ugly.