this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
2538 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4303 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zoomzoom@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will this not just be taken to mean X (as the app maintainer) needs to have the ability to block users it considers to be abusive from the app.

I don’t think this rule is specifying what an individual user of the app must be able to do.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes I agree, that's how I interpreted it

[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely then they wouldn’t mention “in-app system..”? At least for Google play.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The play store one seems to be pretty clear. The rule right above is that there must be an in app solution for reporting abusive behavior, and someone at the platform must review and act on legitimate reports. The highlighted rule, in that context, can only mean users being able to block other users themselves

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah you're right. You could still argue that blocking DMs is enough though, the rule isn't clear to what degree

Block has a pretty clear definition, if they can still contact you in any format they aren't blocked.