this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
2539 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
59174 readers
2105 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This doesn’t require the user to be able to block, it’s required that there is the ability to block a user from the system in general.
If it's an "in-app system" that the user doesn't have access to, what's the point of building it into the app at all?
The people running the service at the company don't use the app itself, they use dedicated internal tools that interact with the service.
They also clearly differentiate between reporting users and content, and requiring that the user be able to directly block them in the app, so I think it's pretty clear they're requiring direct blocking at the end user level.
Play Store looks pretty specific, an, "in-app system". I don't know how content moderation by administrators could be construed as, "in-app".
That didnt stop this dumb post to get 1700 upvotes. this outrage over twitter is so cringe. they don't have to use it, and there's really no reason to give it more attention than it already gets.
It's the largest social media right now.
It makes sense that changes to it, especially changes like this, are news.
Except the title and content of this post isn't even accurate.
Yes it is.