SneerClub

989 readers

3 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

self@awful.systems

blakestacey@awful.systems

dgerard@awful.systems

here's a great and useful rundown of Scott Alexander Siskind's actual awful beliefs, from a centrist who found it difficult to accept until that email leaked (miniver.blogspot.com)

submitted 6 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

NSFW 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Either that or he let his performative contrarianism get out of hand, he did delete the post after all.

Still, it's just like an HBD enthusiast heavy into eugenic optimisation to think that there might be something to measuring skulls, even if it didn't pan out the first time, maybe if they had known about IQ it would have been different, it's a shame the woke mob has made using calipers on school children a crime, etc.

[–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

As far as I know Siskind has never deleted any idea for the contrarianism motivating it getting out of hand. It’s just against his character. Much more likely he considered it revealing his power level (even if he recognised himself as never having really endorsed the idea besides contrarianism in the first place).

Less charitably, more plausibly, at the outside he recognised that it’s a stupid fucking thing to say that makes him look just not smart.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 2 points 6 months ago

That's the trouble with talking about thoroughly disingenuous people, you get bogged down with defining if they meant to mean what they wrote. It's all optics.