this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
307 points (79.9% liked)

Political Memes

5237 readers
1513 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Hi!

Biden tried to forgive half a trillion dollars in student debt, took the biggest action on climate change in history which is estimated to reduce emissions by 40% by 2030 if Trump doesn't undo it, strengthened the NLRB which has been giving legal backing to a lot of these union wins, grew wages at the bottom end of the pay scale even in the face of historic inflation, and a few other things.

It is also relevant that he doesn't want to end democracy in the Unites States, "finish the job" in Gaza, or fire on protestors with live ammunition, like Trump does. But if for some reason you've decided it's not allowed to make the decision on those bases (and I don't know why it wouldn't), there are also good things to say about Biden.

Oh, I mean, my bad. Rail strike worst president ever both sides amirite

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Biden rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement, revoked the Keystone Pipeline permit, created a 13 million acre federal petroleum reserve for Alaskan wildlife, greatly increased oil site lease cost, signed $7B in solar subsidies, enacted the Inflation Reduction act to support clean energy, created the CHIPS Act to improve reliance on domestic technology, reenacted Net Neutrality, repealed Title 42, ended the Muslim Ban, signed the Equality Act for LGBTQ+ rights, restored gay rights to beneficiaries, reenacted trans care anti-discrimination law, signed the Respect for Marriage Act, enabled unspecified gender on US Passports, rejoined WHO, rescheduled marijuana, reducing drug costs with the American Rescue Plan Act…

Edit: I misunderstood when I read the second half of your comment. For what it’s worth, I agree about Israel. It’s simply not a comparison since Trump has been clear about his intentions with Palestine and Ukraine.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Wait, I am confused. Are we arguing? I thought Biden was doing great up until Netanyahu started killing Gazans by the thousands. He's been doing weird little half-hearted things like holding up the weapons shipments, but hauling Netanyahu to the ICC would have been a better idea.

But yes, in general, Biden's a huge improvement over the norm in a bunch of ways that for some reason aren't talked about real often, and Trump is the end of the world (for the Palestinians and other Arabs and Hispanics and a whole bunch of other minorities foreign and domestic, in addition to everyone else). I feel like we're on the same page on that, and I didn't realize when I read your first message.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

My initial comment was intended to imply that there’s no “pro-Trump” argument, only “anti-Biden” arguments, so it read that way to me. I’m sorry if I misunderstood your intention through context. I’m pretty tired. I’ll edit for clarity.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ha, all good. I got it backwards; I thought you were saying the opposite. But yeah, makes sense.

Maybe I am just excited to argue with some internet "leftists" who for some reason have their leftism mostly restricted to activism about not voting for Biden, and nothing else. There are a lot of them here in general, but maybe they are absent currently in this thread, because they're afraid we will gang up on them

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Agreed. It’s selfish and arrogant to know Trump will facilitate the killing of more innocent civilians and still abstain from voting on principle. Biden is literally the lesser of two evils in regards to Israel. Hopefully the UN and State Department find enough proof to give Biden a firm platform for withdrawal of support soon. It’ll save lives, and we won’t have to think about the despicable trolley car from now until November.

I was the one who had it backwards. Thanks for being understanding of my confusion.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It is also relevant that he doesn't want to end democracy in the Unites States, "finish the job" in Gaza, or fire on protestors with live ammunition.

yet, he does. democracy is barely a thing in the US, israel is finishing the job on gaza with his money, and students were disproportionaly crushed by the police for daring to even complain.

i judge politicians by actions and not words.

Rail strike worst president ever both sides amirite

unironically this. he used police force to coopt what could have been the first actual worker win in decades for less than bare minimum rights. he prohibited them from striking. he did stop rich people from losing money from it.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t realize that the police departments reported directly to the President. Do you have a source on that?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

how will trump shoot the protesters like op is saying he will then?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He can’t. They were simply referring to Trump’s response to the peaceful protest of the killing of George Floyd. “Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?” It’s not within his power, although it does clearly illuminate his opinion of protesters.

If the President takes direct oversight of local law enforcement, we have much larger problems on our hands. That’s exactly how Benito Mussolini took fascist control of his nation.

https://www.history.com/news/mussolini-italy-fascism#

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If the President takes direct oversight of local law enforcement, we have much larger problems on our hands.

why cant biden do this then?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For the same reason Trump can’t. I wrote “the President,” not Trump, for a reason. There’s a hierarchy in local and state law enforcement unlike the direct command of military or the National Guard. They are state-regulated bodies, not overseen nationally. The Director-General of Police reports to the Mayor, who in turn reports to the Governor.

If the National Guard shows up to regulate a protest, you can blame the President. Y’know, like Trump did to the protesters in DC and Portland.

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-barr-used-loophole-deploy-national-guard-u-s-cities-ncna1236034

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I’m not OP, but Trump attempted more than once to have the National Guard shoot protesters with live ammunition.

There are enough guardrails in place that it didn’t work, but part of what I expect this time around would be the Florida State Guard and similar Neo-brownshirts coming into their own so that he would literally be able to do it.

Also, he had CBP showing up to protests and snatching people without identifying themselves or utilizing the existing jail / police / court infrastructure. It actually took a little time for people to even figure out who were these unidentified big quasi-police grabbing protestors and driving away with them, or where they had taken them.

Biden is, as far as I know, not personally involved in violence against protesters today. Trump was personally involved in violence against BLM protesters, and wanted to increase its severity to lethal force levels.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yes. The President can direct the National Guard, not the state or local police that have been shutting down protests. Their oversight begins with the Mayor, and stops at the Governor. The President must formally declare a National Emergency to have police oversight. If you want to complain about the police, blame the Mayor. If the National Guard shuts down a protest, blame Biden.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago