this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
217 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3769 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Someone possessing the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice could be prosecuted and sentenced to prison.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 63 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They can't really do that if there's a Democrat in the White House and the courts are semi rational. You really can't stop a certified drug from being distributed through the post office nationally. But, you change either of those conditions and the lunatics will run the asylum. They'll bring back sodomy laws too.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

and the courts are semi rational

Found the problem.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Especially the 5th circuit. That's where Matthew Kacsmaryk punts the dumbest cases to Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas, who then shit all over the law.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah the GOP has the ability to defacto veto any legislation in the country. Kacsmaryk will issue a nationwide injunction on any policy they ask him to. It's fucking nuts.

And then the courts try to rein in this obvious forum shopping and the Northern District in TX just says "naw, we aren't going to listen to that". How the fuck does that shit fly?!

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Same way it always has: cuz no one suffers any actual consequences.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Sounds like a good place to start when the revolution comes.

[–] dan42O@infosec.pub 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Right behind it, is condoms for females?