this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
383 points (96.1% liked)

Firefox

17766 readers
35 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The point is, it didn't. Tabs do not take memory space unless you actively interact with them in Firefox.

[–] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And yet since switching to firefox last year I've had more problems with FF eating memory and the browser slowing down, than I ever with Chrome. (not that I'm switching back)

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Interesting Though Chrome is much less of a RAM-hopper nowadays either.

[–] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah. It's pretty good in that regard. It usually hogs a bit, but it's very good at releasing it if it's needed elsewhere. FF though, not so much.