this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
615 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
404 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People who argue against free speech always do so on legal grounds. Nobody seems to want to attack free speech as an ethical concept.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I think it depends on how you define free speech. There are plenty of people arguing against unrestricted free speech on this particular instance, and it's a core value of the instance (intolerance of the intolerant).

On the contrary, people who argue for unrestricted free speech always seem to do so on legal grounds, constantly quoting the first amendment as though it applies to private platforms or to people outside the US.