this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
103 points (87.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 37 points 7 months ago (4 children)

That lack of anything Isreal related is fucking frustrating. There's so much assumption that "working class" means completely ignorant about international policy.

Some of these points are good but the one that would knock it out of the park is increasing tax and spend - especially if accompanied by an increase to the range of tax exempt income (raising the floor of the bottom tax bracket).

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hate to break it to you, but foreign policy will not win you any election except if the US is at war.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Don't tell Lemmy users that! Don't ruin the narrative!

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That lack of anything Isreal related is fucking frustrating. There’s so much assumption that “working class” means completely ignorant about international policy.

If you assumed "American" meant completely ignorant about international policy, you'd be correct more often than not - and this is coming from an American who does follow foreign affairs. So why would "American working class" be an exception?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Given how many people are upset about those polices, to the point of using armies of police to harass college students for being against those policies, it seems that it is an important issue to a lot of Americans and its not exactly a secret how unpopular current international policy is. They might not be average Americans, but those who are likely to vote democrat are those people they're using violence to silence.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are people upset? This started out defining working class as non-college. I see protests at colleges and technical people (like you’d see on Lemmy) are more likely to be college educated than the general population is.

I mean, I’m asking seriously, I have no idea. This elitist coastal college educated libtard has no clue what the racist gullible uneducated flyover people who falls for Trump’s BS think

[–] Bye@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

He is as anti Israel as he can be. Usually anything less than full throated support would lose the election for a candidate of either party. And he’s still managed to condemn them a little bit, and is building a pier for aid delivery to Palestinians so fucking hmas can’t steal their aid. Like there really isn’t much more you can ask of a us politician without basically asking them to forfeit the election.