this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
294 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38859 readers
1973 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine has begun using longer-range ballistic missiles against Russia that were secretly provided by the US, American officials have confirmed.

The weapons were sent as part of a previous US support package, and arrived this month. Officials said they were not announced publicly to maintain Ukraine's "operational security".

They have already been used at least once to strike Russian targets in occupied Crimea.

Further US aid is now heading to Kyiv. 

More American weaponry is expected to be sent imminently, after President Joe Biden signed off on Wednesday a new package of economic and military support for Ukraine worth $61bn (£49bn).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Ukraine should be getting support from more than just the US though, if you include their own military budget and EU funding what would the total number be?

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I know the EU/Nato wants to pass another 60ish billion to Ukraine as well so that would make things more similar. BTW this is with dollars that can be used to pay for products almost anywhere in the world vs Russia's ruple which isn't as easily accepted throughout the world, and also the fact that they're basically embargo'd by most of the world. So really, that 140 billion figure is worth less than what MxM11 said.

Weirdly, they only focus on budget instead of mentioning the fact that Russia is losing more soldiers than Ukraine is (meat shield strategy) which is of course counteracted by the fact that Russia has about 4 times the population than Ukraine, but also technologies being used in the battlefield (Ukraine is increasingly using more advanced technologies as the war continues, while Russia is doing the opposite).

Things aren't looking great for Ukraine, but they aren't looking any better for Russia either. Considering that Russia is 2 years into a war that, according to them, should have only taken a couple of days. Things will get worse as Russia tries to control more Ukrainian land, as taking control of land is one thing, but maintaining it from people that don't like you is also hard work.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

they’re basically embargo’d by most of the world

A big portion of the world isn't aligned with the US and has no embargo on Russia. Like we're talking almost everything except US / Western Europe / Australia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_sanctions_during_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#/media/File:Russian-list-of-unfriendly-countries.svg

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

You're right, I misspoke. A better way to put it is embargo'd by many vendors of advanced technologies that Russia doesn't manufacture. China is an obvious trading partner of theirs, but Russia is dealing with a smaller available supply of all of these components and other countries know this which means they are going to have to pay higher prices, vs Ukraine being supported by NATO countries and more able to purchase directly. The point remains, Russia needs to pay more to secure the components that they do not manufacture meaning their money doesn't go as far as Ukraine's

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dude, even India and China is getting behind sanctions. Maybe not because they want to, but because guess who are Chinas biggest economical partners? Hint: it's not russia. And IIRC (I can be wrong here) Indias biggest partner is also the EU, maybe the USA but also China.

It could be better for sure, but russia is almost alone on the world stage. I mean they are getting saved by Iran & NK. Wow.

Russia has an economy the size of Spain/Italy, their economy is getting wrecked so hard right now we'll better planning for when it goes full crash-burn

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

even India and China is getting behind sanctions.

Today this article popped up about sanctioning china because they are supplying russian arms manufacturers with resources: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/26/antony-blinken-beijing-visiit-china-us-relations-foreign-minister-wang-yi

A quick google search pulls up dozens of articles about how China is helping the Russian war effort...

India however doesn't supply arms, but instead buys them from Russia. Instead India is buying Russia's oil, funding their war effort in another way. India is buying 13x the amount of oil they would normally buy from Russia pre-war. https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/19/europe/russia-oil-india-shadow-fleet-cmd-intl/index.html

I don't see China truly reducing their war supplies to China, nor do I see India calling off their oil deal. Unless Russia is actually cut off they're just going to keep getting supplies.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Seems you are right, bummer :-/. Hope we can squeeze them to stop supporting russias war.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ukraine defense spending in 2024 is $40B. It is not easy to find total number from all EU countries, but historically they give significantly less for military spending for Ukraine. There is big 50B package from EU, but it is mostly economical and over 4 years. But let me overestimate and suggest 20B as military aid for Ukraine. All together is $120B and is still less than what Russia spends and it is before accounting for purchasing parity. US, and especially EU countries should significantly increase military help for Ukraine to push back. And while EU countries increased military spending it is just not enough.

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean US spent trillions in Iraq, more spending doesn't mean more effective.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 14 points 5 months ago

US won Iraq war militarily well before it spend even half a trillion. US failed at reconstruction.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ukraine should be getting support from more than just the US though

America is the world's largest arms manufacturer and exporter. Russia is the second largest. Maybe China ranks after that, but everyone else except maybe France pales by comparison.

[–] derGottesknecht@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Russian arms sales dropped to sixth place after the invasion.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

dropped

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sales dropped, but manufacturing surged.

[–] derGottesknecht@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, thats why I said sales dropped.