this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
1013 points (81.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9736 readers
776 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The trouble is that ratcheting up the tax on additional homes won't discourage anyone - the additional costs can just be passed on to the renters.

I'd suggest making it illegal for companies to own residential property for longer than 12 months.

Hopefully this would free up enough homes to bring prices back down.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"can be" passed to the renters, but in a free market someone else can do that for cheaper if it is their second home vs their 20th.

Each successive property is less and less profitable the more you have, compared to others that don't have as many.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But this is exactly the point - the market isn't free, it's being controlled. Primarily by companies that are buying up as many properties as they can.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

As long ad there are at least two companies in an area, it will be less profitable for every extra property versus your competitor. That at least makes hoarding harder, as anyone can come in to out compete the two duopolies as their first will be way more profitable than the established's 11th. In turn, keeping prices down, scaled by the increase in taxes per extra property