this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
1004 points (81.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9546 readers
456 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You'd have to get rid of the concept of private property and that isn't going anywhere. Same with landlords.

You're not going to vote this out of the system.

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You don’t need to get rid of private property to undo a lot of the damage done by landlords. You can build subsidized housing to compete. You can write tax codes to make it unprofitable for people to own more than one house. You can tax land by area instead of by built value to encourage building high-density housing.

There are a lot of levers that other countries have been willing to pull that partially counteract the damage of landlording, but the US has been reluctant to touch.

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the only comment that I read so far that goes a bit deeper than: landlord bad let's remove them

Thank you

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I especially like the "lever" analogy, most people tend to think in absolutes and dichotomies, instead of realizing that an equation can have many variables with many coefficients.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's the same argument people made when we abolished slavery. "But if you do that property as a concept will vanish". No. No it won't.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago

In the USA that's a complicated topic. If you look at how it played out in England and France, yes. Slave owners were compensated for their "losses" after heated debates in parliaments

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It's still in, baby