this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
196 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16950 readers
617 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

BG2 was a huge game too, and it took 25 years for a sequel.

They're not going to pick a studio and crank out bg4 in just a couple years.

I'll be surprised if it takes less than a decade.

[–] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago (1 children)

WOTC can put the name "Baldurs Gate 4" on whatever they want. They could make a Farmville clone in 2 months and release it as "Baldurs Gate 4" if they want. They own the copyright.

It just won't be good.

But it'll probably sell decently well.

[–] li10@feddit.uk 36 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t Wizards of the Coast scummy af?

Larian are the studio with integrity, why wouldn’t Wizards of the Coast go for the cash grab?

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

100% BG4 will be a cash grab

[–] Godort@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

My understanding is that Wizards is mostly pretty good. Its their corpo overlords at Hasbro to watch for

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Let me tell you as an employee at a studio where the parent company is widely viewed as shitty: it doesn't matter. The rot starts at the head, and even good managers can get shitty. My workplace unionized and got recognition, and our overwhelmingly liked manager then went and violated status quo.

Did Hasbro or WotC send the Pinkertons after that guy who got a pre release card? It doesn't matter, because a corporation that owns the IP still sent the Pinkertons after a random customer.

[–] Banrik@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago

WotC is a division of Hasbro now & if you use MtG as a reference you can see the plan seems to be to drain the swamp. I think in their shareholders meetings they want MtG to double its earning in 4 years... So I'd imagine they're looking for angles on D&D & BG may be the flagship for this.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Was it WotC or Hasbro that sent Pinkerton's to someone's house to steal their Magic cards because a retailer accidentally sold them cards from the new set a couple days too early?

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 points 8 months ago

Potayto, potahto

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The problem is that Hasbro is desperately trying to make more money from WotC. But fairly recent actions indicate that they don't have players' best interests at heart. They fired all the contacts that Larian worked with. So nobody is left who has even a modicum of insight into how BG3 was done so well.

I fear several cheap cash grabs are in store for us. The first will probably be a quick and dirty DLC that will come out in a year or two.

[–] thejynxed@lemmy.basedcount.com 5 points 8 months ago

Hasbro fired more than half of the people at WotC that created the 4E and 5E rulesets.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, cranking out another entry to capitalize on BG3's success would be a terrible move. I'm so glad Hasbro/WotC are not known for making terrible moves. That would be so unlike them to trade in goodwill for short-term profits.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Me too! And I hope the Pinkertons investigate anyone claiming otherwise!

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It took less than 2 years to release BG2 after BG1. In the meantime Bioware licensed Infinity Engine to Black Isle who released Planescape Torment and Icewind Dale one year apart.

It took Larian 6 years to develop BG3 after Divinity 2. They moved on to their new game but that engine and assets could be similarily licensed to other studios to churn out some games using similar or simplified formula.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I believe the engine is larian's

[–] nman90@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Definitely is. Try playing Divinity 2 and you will realize it's the exact same engine just with a modified ruleset to match Baldurs gate more. I actually prefer Divinity, they just have more freedom as far as setting and the ruleset than a liscensed ip owned by another company

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

That's certain but licensing engine could be additional revenue stream for Larian. They benefit from cRPG market becoming more mainstream too. And I'd kill for more games with couch coop implemented this well.