this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
356 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1427 readers
111 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
356
The whole internet loves Kagi, a lovely paid search engine that can find things! 5 seconds later We regret to inform you the CEO is an unhinged narcissist who will harangue you in email (hackers.town)
submitted 7 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
204 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The whole internet loves Kagi

Lol no

Also Kagi is a glorified Google front end.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also Kagi is a glorified Google front end.

The fact a glorified Google front end manages to be less shit than Google is a pretty damning indictment of Google, I'll give Kagi that. Quoting Cory Doctorow, gratuitous italics and all:

The implications of this are stunning. It means that Google's enshittified search-results are a choice. Those ad-strewn, sub-Altavista, spam-drowned search pages are a feature, not a bug. Google prefers those results to Kagi, because Google makes more money out of shit than they would out of delivering a good product: https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/2/24117976/best-printer-2024-home-use-office-use-labels-school-homework

[–] mountainriver@awful.systems 13 points 7 months ago

A Danish ad company made a Google interface that they called "impersonal me" which searched Google with no personalisation. And not only was it better than Google search, it found things that normal Google just didn't show. In particular old comments I had written and lost track of. In the impersonal search they were easily found, in the normal search they weren't way down on the list, they weren't in the list at all.

Fascinatingly bad.

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 15 points 7 months ago

This is a reference to the milkshake duck tweet

[–] DdCno1@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yup. Last time I checked, you paid money to get the exact same results. Brilliant.

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Ya but they are in a different order