gamingcirclejerk

Of course there is space for both. In a total fantasy game, like Nier Automata, or Bayonetta, or Stellar Blade, crafting an impossible beauty can just be part of the tone, or story craft. In Nier, the female androids are beautiful and the male are children because the male dominated society that invented them designed them that way, beautiful women and non threatening men, interesting commentary on today's society for a game set thousands of years from now.

But in a game going for a gritty realism, or a grounded type of experience, like the Last of Us, or Horizon Zero Dawn, realistic looking characters with faces molded by lived experience is what will make the game immersive, and sell the experience to players. Abby looks like a woman driven by revenge, spending her days in the weight room and pounding back ration burritos in preparation.

These folks don't seem to get that, they want every game to star 2B, and they have no idea what 2B's design is saying about humanity. Art is lost to them.

Yeah seriously. Even if your goal is peak beauty,(I'll try anything once) and you think there's only one static eternal standard that matters(insane) part of how you achieve that is contrast with ugliness, both static and dynamic.

I'll say this referencing a German, so these people can understand. To paraphrase hegel: 'everything exists in a context, it cannot exist without context, and if it could, that would basically be god. Which doesn't look like a hot lady, because 'looking' like things is the product of reflected light or touch and this hypothetical thing does not have context'