this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
832 points (97.0% liked)

Political Memes

5453 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Register to vote: https://vote.gov

Contact your reps:

Senate: https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?Class=1

House of Representatives: https://contactrepresentatives.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But in order to have the comforts of life, we need peoples to do stuff and cooperate and coordinate.. think about who runs the cables for your Internet or maintains the cell towers, picks up your trash, grows the avocados for your guacamole, manufactures the medicines..etc etc.

I unironically believe that these things would get done without the need of coercing people to do them by stripping them of the means of survival. Anthropology backs me up on this one.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Show me some horsey sourcey cuz

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-mutual-aid-a-factor-of-evolution

Also: The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow. Basically: anything by Graeber.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did you just use a book written in 1902 as a source

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Is the origin of species out of date, cause it is older?

Also, the bulk of Graeber's work is from the 21st century.

You can just say that you don't want to believe me, you know.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As I said: if you want contemporary anthropological sources: read basically any book by David Graeber. Mutual Aid is a bit old, but still relevant, too.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Give me some excerpts, quotes or a chapter, using whole books is a little vague and isn't getting your point across. Yeah Darwin's book is still relevant but we have also learned a lot more with his theories as the foundation(comparing biology to anthropology?). Your books are working off of what the primitive societal needs of long ago were, right? Do you really think that those same concepts apply to the society of today?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Look, I'm not ananthropologist and I'm trying to sneak in some lemmy while no one's watching at work, so I'm not going to be able to immediately supply you with concise excerpts of anthropological learnings on human nature.

The gist of Mutual Aid is that cooperation within a species is a vital factor of evolution. That's why I namedropped Darwin. That thesis complements the origin of species.

Yeah Darwin's book is still relevant but we have also learned a lot more with his theories as the foundation

Still doesn't mean that you can't learn anything from a book published in 1902, or that it's not worth reading anymore.

comparing biology to anthropology?

Why is this controvertial? Aren't humans a biological species? Anthropology and biology are about as connected as physics and math is.

Your books are working off of what the primitive societal needs of long ago were, right?

No, they aren't (exclusively). They give testimony of how we got here and that things can be different as they are now.

Do you really think that those same concepts apply to the society of today?

Yes, at least partly. The human brain has had the same biology for the last 100.000 years. You can learn things about human nature from this massive time scale. The basic gist of basically everything Graeber wrote is that societies are formable things. The societies we form will in turn change the way humans interact with each other (changing "human nature"). This in turn means that the whole notion of "progress" being a linear thing, only going into one, unchangeable direction is wrong.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you are confused about what you believe in. It's ok, we have all been there bud

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think you are quite an arrogant prick.

That sure is one way to not have to engage and still feel superior, huh? /s

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I lik u. Wil u b frend?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's a qualitative question in what the "free" tier entails. If it's basic survival, then that might be "affordable" with room to motivate. If the adequate food was "bachelor chow and water", ok. If the "home" is a basic bed with a lockable door in a walkin closet sized room, ok.

If we say everyone should get all you can eat buffet with quality apartments, then you start eroding the mechanism to motivate people to do work that needs to be done.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

I'd like to distance myself from the individualistic, service-oriented notion that an allayou-can-eat-buffet entails.

Give people free homes and a community and they'll sooner or later create an all you can eat potluck.