this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
202 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 74 points 7 months ago (5 children)

How does it feel to be a federal judge and have the vast majority of legal scholars and prosecutors be so fundamentally critical of your orders it's like they are calling you incompetent, corrupt, or both? And you wonder why you lose clerks?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 73 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cannon doesn't give two shits about that or she wouldn't be blatantly siding with the defendant who nominated her.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My "guess" is that Jack Smith has decided it's now or never to get rid of Judge Cannon. It's clear she is dragging this out intentionally. Once Judge Cannon responds that she will not "speed things up" , Jack Smith will go to the Appellete Court and ask to have her removed . That she will give a shit about.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If she is removed it won't matter if she gives a shit about anything.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, then she'll just be a federal judge who is known to be overturned easily and not to be trusted by her colleagues

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

While still being on the bench and doing damage to the system...

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can't do much damage when you're being overturned.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 7 months ago

Long term most of the damage can be mitigated, but the delays and the possibility of being able to ruin a case with a bad ruling in the middle of the trial that can't be undone is still doing damage.

If she can delay until after the election, that has an impact that can't be overturned.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Bank accounts will beg to differ.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

100 bucks says they deny his appeal and what he says comes true. 100% like Trump and co want and all the GOP. These whole things a joke.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 47 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They've already overturned her twice. They know she's an incompetent hack & beholden to Trump.

I said it yesterday, she wants to be removed at a late enough stage of the trial that it will take another judge past the election to get up to speed on the case.

[–] JaymesRS 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s important to note too that the ones overturning her were appointed by conservative presidents. It’s that blatantly bad.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We just have to hope their conservative bias doesn't go so far as a fascist takeover. The Bush years were bad but not on this level of corrupt.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why do people keep calling her incompetent? As far as I can tell, she's been doing her job -- being a blatantly corrupt ally of Trump -- perfectly.

What opportunity to skew the trial in Trump's favor has she not taken advantage of? 'Cause that's the true measure of her being incompetent.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, this seems more on the order of weaponized incompetence, it's giving the appearance of incompetence for a specific purpose so she can try to avoid claims of corruption or bias. Otherwise, she's doing the job she was put in there to do, that's why Trump and the GOP were so hot on getting all those Judges appointed.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You know a whole bunch of Trump people are in prison right and they've already been working on seizing his assets in increments of $100 million

I'm as jaded as anyone about the leniency the justice system keeps showing to Trump, but it's not like everything has been going exactly his way

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Justice delayed is justice denied when the damage is ongoing.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 7 months ago

100% agreed

Everyone's treating it like business as usual. The third floor of the building is engulfed in flames, and the manager on duty is saying "Well we need to finish the staff meeting, dealing with the fire is on the agenda yes, but we have other business to take care of also."

Anyone dealing with anything Trump related should have 24/7 security from the Justice Dept, and everything else on their plate they should get a pass on. If some drug dealers they were also trying a case for need to wait, that's okay.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

It's not as though his peons getting locked up means fuck about dick to him. They were always cannon fodder. They served their purpose.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Feels great, I'm a narcissist and they're talking about me