Asklemmy

43739 readers

1220 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

117

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

291 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does the set of all sets that are not members of themselves, contain itself?

Russel's Paradox lit a fire under mathematics, leading to all sorts of good things (and a few bad).

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Python's got you covered.

In [5]: [x for x in [...] if x not in [...]]
Out[5]: []