this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
70 points (86.5% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3540 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hillary Rodham Clinton-(https://archive.ph/goTP7)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Like all liberals, she misses the point - if it isn't anti capitalist, it isn't helping.
Especially when it comes to discussion of alienation which is a feature of capitalism, not a bug.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ever get tired of Capitalism being the cause of all our problems? I do. I was discussing Capitalist Realism yesterday and was overwhelmed by the magnitude of its pervasiveness.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really is at the heart of pretty much every problem that we face today, and one of the things it does best, as you mention capitalist realism, is convince us that it is not only the only way, but that it is the predictable result of "human nature". It really becomes more perverse, and more enraging, the more you look.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You might enjoy this Zoe Bee video. She dispels that myth very well.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/tGVe4Fju0P0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, I don't have the brain power to watch the whole thing right now, but have saved for future reference!

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not exactly tired of it, but I know what you mean. It’s so blinking obvious how it poisons everything. What I’m tired of is trying to figure out how to win over the politically naive to this understanding.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I’ve determined that it is impossible until they are affected personally by it. The population is not educated to interpret its effects. This is the impetus to political polarization. Stay strong and informed. When the time comes to direct solutions, you will be needed.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need a balance of capitalism, socialism, and democracy. We are unbalanced toward capitalism. We just need to tip the scale, not overthrow capitalism.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A for profit economy cannot coexist with the planned economy of socialism. In mixed economies, which the US has now, capitalism will always overtake the social policies. It is happening now in Denmark and Norway. They are privatizing their social safety nets. I respect the idea of moderation, but in this case it won’t work. Capitalism must be disassembled and replaced with a planned economy with an actual democratic workplace.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sympathetic to this because capitalism is indeed eating society, but I'm not convinced a planned economy would work. Are there large scale examples of planned economies working?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/xuBrGaVhjcI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if only she could comprehend your magic solution to the problems

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It isn't a lack of comprehension, especially not in someone of her position, it is a reluctance to give up privileges she is well aware she has, even if she wouldn't admit it out loud.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

and you're a mind reader, that's impressive.. but a lot of responsibility..

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, you don't need to read minds, just open your eyes, but sure, whatever...

[–] theodewere@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i honor your spirit, Storms of Desserts.. whether you are apple crumbs, or blueberry tarts.. i don't care which flavor you choose..

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] theodewere@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] theodewere@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

She knows exactly what the problem is, she just chooses to think the system can be reformed. A common misconception. Marxists would call her a class traitor.