this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1190 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59261 readers
2695 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zunon@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

yes it does, net neutrality not only has to do with the ISP but also the services. different useragent string should NOT lead to a worse quality of service.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right, but your service provider has nothing to do with that difference. The fact that the entity you're contacting on the other end of the connection is providing a degraded experience isn't an internet service delivery problem.

Your internet service, which is what net neutrality is concerned with, is distinct from services on the internet. In the same way that your phone service has nothing to do with the quality of service you get from HP's telephone support line.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The web is based on open standards; that’s what made it universally accessible. How does limiting access based on how you access the web benefit anyone?

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

Nobody is defending the practice, they're just differentiating it from what we've previously referred to as "net neutrality," which is 100% entirely about how ISPs process internet traffic, and not about the services being used within that traffic.

Unless I missed the memo, and "net neutrality" means something different now.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social -1 points 11 months ago

It doesn't, but that isn't their point. They're simply pointing out that existing net neutrality laws in the US usually only apply to ISPs and telcos, not internet businesses.