this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
230 points (91.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers
314 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I prefer and default to fitgirl, but I'll admit that sometimes the long unpack time doesn't seem worth the sometimes only 1-5gb file size difference.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It’s primarily meant for people who have slow connections. If you’re downloading a game over DSL or satellite (which is often the only thing available unless you’re in an urban/suburban area) then the 5GB of extra compression could be a huge time difference. It’s also true for metered connections, where you have to pay by the GB, or where you have a data cap.

[–] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 7 months ago

It's pretty relevant for people who archive too because it can add up to terrabytes of difference if you're backing up everything.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 7 months ago

Can confirm, 5gb extra is about 9 more hours of downloading, presuming everything goes well

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 10 points 7 months ago

I think there's likely a lot of people still on slower links that benefit for sure.

But as gigabit and better Internet becomes more mainstream, it's certainly less of a problem for those with that.