this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
73 points (89.2% liked)

Political Memes

5509 readers
1073 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you actually talked with “tankies?” Yes, some are so anti-NATO that they veer into authoritarianism. But not all, or even most. I’ve had better discussions with tankies than liberals on here. Do I agree with everything they say? No. But I can understand where they’re coming from. Try talking with some. Are you pro-NATO?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you actually talked with “tankies?”

Yes. Too many. I've been arguing with tankies for a decade and a half now. I once knew a guy from Aussieland who wrote long rambling screeds on how firebombing capitalists was the only way for the proletariat forward. I knew a Westerner who unironically praised Juche and decried everything anti-NK as capitalist propaganda. I knew an atheist-turned-ultra-Orthodox who critically praised Stalin.

I've talked to plenty of fucking tankies. Some of them aren't inherently bad people, deep down. But they all have shitty views.

Yes, some are so anti-NATO that they veer into authoritarianism.

Are you... are you taking the piss?

The entire point of a 'tankie' is that they veer into authoritarianism.

'Tankie' doesn't mean 'socialist', it means 'apologist for the kind of regimes that would crush the socialist revolution of Hungary in 1956 for being the wrong kind of socialist'.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you don’t consider tankies socialist? Are Marxist Leninist socialists? Are you socialist?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Tankie doesn't mean socialist" meaning "Tankie and socialist are not synonyms". All tankies are (arguably) socialists, but not all socialists are tankies. Most socialists, since the fall of the USSR and the flow of funds from it, are not tankies.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By not answering if you are a socialist or if you’re pro-NATO, I can only assume you are a liberal or centrist. If that is the case, I can understand why you hate tankies. You are closer to MAGA then they are. Of course they’re your enemy.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

lmao. Not a tankie, just using the same rhetoric as they do. Why don't you call me a 'social fascist' next for believing in a democratic government?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is MAGA or right conservatism more of a threat than tankies?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To me, personally? MAGA is more of a threat. To many elsewhere in the world, tankies are the greater threat. Unless you'd like to go talk to some folk in concentration camps in Xinjiang and tell them that their real threat is American right-wingers.

Nazis are worse than tankies, but not for lack of trying by tankies.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From a utilitarianist perspective, American right-wingers are a bigger threat. If they take over, they have an $860 billion military to unleash on the world. The way I’m interpreting this; you’re a closet conservative who thinks he’s a liberal. Yo hate communism more than fascism. Am I correct?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they take over, they have an $860 billion military to unleash on the world.

"To unleash on the world"

Tell me you have a surface level understanding of world politics without saying you have a surface level understanding of world politics.

Yo hate communism more than fascism. Am I correct?

I already literally said the opposite

Nazis are worse than tankies, but not for lack of trying by tankies.

Are you even pretending to argue in good faith at this point? If you are, it's not very convincing.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I try to always argue in good faith. But I tire of arguing with liberals/ conservatives with recursive arguments. There is no logic. If there is, you fail to make me understand it. Is this WhatIfAltHist?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I try to argue in good faith", they say in response to being called out for literally ignoring the fact that I already answered that fascists were worse than tankies, and disingenuously asserting the opposite with a leading question.

We're done here.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, you said that fascist are worse than tankies. I didn’t mean to offend you. I have a dentist appt. tomorrow and I’m on edge. You never answered what is better than a planned economy?