this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
526 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2225 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said policy differences toward Israel between her and President Biden won’t stop her from supporting him in the November general election.

“Of course,” Omar said Tuesday, when asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip on “NewsNight” whether she would vote for Biden if the election were held that day, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. “Democracy is on the line, we are facing down fascism.”

“And I personally know what my life felt like having Trump as the president of this country, and I know what it felt like for my constituents, and for people around this country and around the world,” Omar continued. “We have to do everything that we can to make sure that does not happen to our country again.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Thanks. I feel like there's only a few of us even calling this out anymore. It's made me tired and really hating Lemmy.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It definitely calls into question the average lemmy user's intelligence.

[–] Hypx@fedia.io 24 points 9 months ago (16 children)

There’s a lot of tankies on Lemmy/Fediverse. They present a misleading picture of what people really think.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would agree with you, had I not just had a conversation with a friend about a discord they're in being infected with the "U.S. is a totalitarian state" tankie bullshit.

Indoctrination works both ways, it isn't just conservatives.

[–] Hypx@fedia.io 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There's tankies on other places too.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

I saw one at Walgreens

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nah, these people are just garden variety idiots. My friend was roommates with one, dumbfuck wasted a ton of his tuition money on drugs and all of a sudden he's communist.

Edit: downvotes huh? Sounds like we've got some people who spent their money unwisely here. Adds up.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Indoctrination works both ways, it isn't just conservatives.

So fucking this.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (31 children)

I met with a few that tries to argue that the correct choice is to vote for third party. And, other people called them out on it.

I'm far-left as you come, but, I still vote for the feasible and better option in the general. I always vote for the better in the primary without exception. I voted for Bernie in 2020 primary even if Biden is guaranteed to have the nomination, and voted for Biden.

And my opinion is that Biden is the better of the two in context of Israel. He at least sanctioned settlers, and some days that will include Jenin(?) settlers. Trump won't do that. And most people that are against Israel has less to do with war at Gaza than settlers and the clowns in Israel government.

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The "I'm voting third party because I don't like either candidate" people are the reason for Trump's first presidency

[–] Albatross2724@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So.. no, that's not even remotely true. The percentage of third party votes would not have helped Hillary win the 2016 election. She ran a terrible campaign and completely ignored the key states: Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. All 3 states, at least at the time, were considered heavily blue states, and she proceeded to lose in all 3. Her campaign lacked a clear, articulated message that spoke to voters to draw out a significant voter turnout, and just underestimated the populism aspect of Trump's run. He was full of shit and his legacy will be the conservative supreme court justices he left behind, but his campaign promised to revitalize dying blue class industries in the Rust belt which incentivized working class voters in a way that Hillary's moderate campaign absolutely failed to.

I don't think the populism factor will attract new voters for this upcoming election, as both Trump and Biden have their core voter bases established. However, the campaign messaging that gives voters incentive for a better turnout will always be the key factor. The message of "Hey, at least I'm not the other guy" does not work. It didn't work in 2016. Hillary didn't even learn from her failed campaign because in the aftermath of her defeat she wrote in her book What Happened, "If just 40,000 people across Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania had changed their minds, I would have won". That whole mindset is just so out of touch with the political landscape in 2016, and this upcoming election cycle will be no different.

[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The third party voters in a handful of states absolutely ended up being the deciding factor. It's not the absolute number of electoral college votes which I think you know but instead the states like Wisconsin and Michigan that Trump won by less than the larger than typical number of green party votes. I don't think that this trick will work twice but it's certainly being astroturfed like crazy again

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

By how many votes did Hillary lose, again?

[–] Albatross2724@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

77 votes in the electoral college. The total electoral college votes for third parties combined (Gary Johnson + Jill Stein) was 7. So in the unlikely event that Hillary won over all of the Gary Johnson libertarian voters and Jill Stein green party voters, she would still have lost. By a lot. She won the popular vote so that's cool. But unfortunately that doesn't win elections.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

She won the popular vote so that’s cool. But unfortunately that doesn’t win elections.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's such a practical topic for the election, too, right? Never mind the shit the Republicans are pulling on a day to day basis- that shit has already been normalized.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Then there's two of us. TWO OF US!!!

load more comments (2 replies)