this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
88 points (88.6% liked)

Canada

7210 readers
239 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not like it worked well with Barette or Couillard. The reality is that the people that want the position shouldn't have it, and the people that don't want the position should have it.

Power attract the people that shouldn't be in power. Simple as that.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not all doctors make good politicians (for example, I doubt that Dr oz would be a good choice as a secretary). But good health ministers are more likely to come from a healthcare background, although you may have really good non-experts doing a ministers job.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I was a bit too sarcastic in my OP. I agree with you that someone with a background in what they administer is a boon.

But my point still stands. In almost all cases, the people vying for power positions are the wrong people for the job.

So the right person, someone that would be less influenced by power, needs to get chewed by their party and raise through the ranks. And if after all this ordeal, they still have their voice left in the party, then they make great minister.