this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
964 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

6705 readers
2225 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

At one point in college some friends and i made up a system for just explicitly state what sort of response you needed. Ok, "made up a system" is a little over stating it. Basically it was "Hey this is important can I have your undivided attention?" through the lens of stupid nerd jokes. Like, "setPriority(10) i'm locked out of my apartment do you have a spare key?" vs "setPriority(0) i am so mad that fallout3 requires GFWL"

Now i'd probably just say "hey this is important do you have a few minutes?" in normal words.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thinking about it, I think I have 4 priorities as things stand: 4 - Message in the group chat 3 - Message in the group chat with @ 2 - Direct message 1 - Phone call

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Priority 00 - A regular text message and two phone calls back to back.

[–] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Priority -1 - I'm showing up at your door.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

-2 - I'm breaking in with a battering ram

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you used setPriority, does that mean all subsequent messages have the same priority? Or is this a dsl that implicitly takes the message as the second parameter?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The priority would stay as set until explicitly changed, or it was set back to the default after a period of inactivity.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty good protocol. I like it.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Its UDP
Unlimited Dependable Priority

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

I unironicly love that

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

setPriority(4) Hmmm actually I like this