this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
515 points (93.7% liked)

Linux

48157 readers
638 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A little admiration of how easy UI customization is on Firefox, and how shitty Chromium looks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 12 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Do you mean Safari?

Name one other browser that is not based on Chromium. If it is based on Chromium, it has to deal with what Google throws at them.

I say this as an enthusiastic Brave user. Brave is great at what it does currently, but the more terrible stuff Google builds into Chromium, the more patches they'll have to maintain. This can make it harder to maintain their fork.

Worse than that, most Chromium-derivative users aren't Brave users. Many web apps already don't work as well with Firefox' JavaScript Engine (Gecko) as they do with Chromium. This gives Google immense power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_(web_browser)#Browsers_based_on_Chromium

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Brave is extremely shady. Really, I used it and even created a script to install it on rpm-ostree distros, but damn that is shady.

https://www.kevinmuldoon.com/do-not-use-brave-browser/

[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

That's a solid criticism. Firefox + uBlock Origin or Librewolf are good desktop alternatives. But what's the alternative on Android? Last time I checked, there wasn't any on privacyguides.

Btw I do always turn off all their rewards and wallet stuff and follow most of the https://privacyguides.org recommendations.

Thanks for your help in making privacy-focused software available on Linux btw!

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fennec, F-Droids fork with proprietary bits removed. & uBlock of course.

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Mull is even better, it's hardened Fennec. It's basically like LibreWolf but for Android.

[–] Borkdornsorkpor@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

I use Firefox + uBlock Origin on Android. You can still install add-ons for the app the same way you do on desktop.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Cromite has adblock. Vanadium too but it may break on on-GrapheneOS as it has security patches that break on regular android.

Mull is very fine for me, I use Vanadium and Mull, Vanadium for crappy sites (because mobile hardened firefox doesnt support as much sites as desktop for some reason). Vanadium is very likely more secure, unlike on Desktop where that is not easily said.

[–] Para_lyzed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Cromite is the best recommendation I can give. It is currently under consideration to be added to privacyguides.org (you can find it on their issues page on the GitHub), and it is expected to be added (as was Bromite, which is where Cromite forked from after development on Bromite was stopped). The main developer of Cromite (uazo) has actually asked the evaluation to be paused until the licensing for aac and h264 are figured out, as licenses are very expensive, and a recommendation on the PrivacyGuides website would likely draw many more users to the project, potentially causing legal trouble. You can track progress on this issue here. It's worth noting that the dev of Cromite was an active dev of Bromite before Bromite's lead dev abandoned the project.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago

GNOME Web technically, based on WebKit. Idk if anyone uses that though.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

Of course there's other browsers! There's Opera...uhh that now based on Chromium. Oh, how about Edge...that's Chromium based too now. I know, there's the KHTML engine!...no, that's been officially discontinued.

[–] RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

GNOME Web, qutebrowser, Konquerer and Falkon. While they are pretty obscure, I personally use Falkon regularly on low end systems/RPi

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Both qutebrowser and Falkon run on the QtWebEngine, essentially Chromium.

[–] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

qutebrowser uses chromium

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Both OP and the author of the linked post explicitly say "Chrome", not "Chromium", and seem to imply those are the only two choices available to users.

If it is based on Chromium, it has to deal with what Google throws at them.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-different-from-chrome/

[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 5 points 8 months ago

Fair point, but the engine is important.

I understand their blog post, and if I were to build a browser today, I'd probably do the same.

But that doesn't mean this situation isn't problematic. It's similar to car-centric infrastructure: in this situation, for any individual, choice X makes sense, but that will make the situation even worse for the whole population. A cumulation of many tiny Prisoner's Dilemmas.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

I wrote Chromiun in the description too. Chrome is simply what people use.

Plain Chromium, even with all GUI settings, all degoogle policy configs and flags enabled, contacts Google like hell.

I tried googeeteller and its scary.

Have not tried Vivaldi for a long time, but its fingerprinting resistance was nonexistent, it is filled with useless features and has no container support, so nah.